Discussions on energy balance and diet have not improved over the years. Most of social media and even the medical literature pretty much conform to what is called, in communications, half-duplex, and tends to generate, as they say, more heat than light. What remains interesting, however, are the scientific points associated with metabolic inefficiency,
The point is that you will store different amounts of fat depending on how many cycles you run in a given amount of time. For weight loss, of course, you hope to run as inefficiently as possible (relative to fat storage). The more cycles you run before cashing in your lipid oxidation chip, the lower the efficiency (of fat storage. The “wasted energy,” however, is less than if you had a lot of starts and stops. Apologies for slip-up
Can you help with the punctuation of these two sentences? I'm scratching my head over what it might mean. A missing parenthesis and what looks like a missing phrase…
For weight loss, of course, you hope to run as inefficiently as possible (relative to fat storage. The more cycles you run before cashing in your lipid oxidation chip, .
Tardigrade: corrected to:
The point is that you will store different amounts of fat depending on how many cycles you run in a given amount of time. For weight loss, of course, you hope to run as inefficiently as possible (relative to fat storage). The more cycles you run before cashing in your lipid oxidation chip, the lower the efficiency (of fat storage. The “wasted energy,” however, is less than if you had a lot of starts and stops. Apologies for slip-up
Can you help with the punctuation of these two sentences? I'm scratching my head over what it might mean. A missing parenthesis and what looks like a missing phrase…
For weight loss, of course, you hope to run as inefficiently as possible (relative to fat storage. The more cycles you run before cashing in your lipid oxidation chip, .